|
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE MALLERSTANG PARISH MEETING HELD ON THE 11th JANUARY 2001 AT ST MARY'S CHURCH MALLERSTANG |
|
1. ATTENDANCE 4.
THE TRAVERS INSTITUTE The Clerk reported that because the Parish Meeting had dithered and had not decided what the £200 licence fee should be used for, the question of Mrs Smart should be able to off set costs of work carried out on the land from the rent was now academic as in the absence of a decision to use the money in another way by the Parish Meeting the monies would have to be used to upkeep the land. Mr Howard proposed that the Clerk be asked to object to the Tree Preservation Order on behalf of the Parish Meeting and Mr Alderson seconded and the motion was carried. Some residents were in favour of looking into the possibility of building a village hall upon the site others were against it. Mr Carver of Monkey Puzzle suggested that it may be possible to build a village hall next to the church. Mr Smart felt that whilst funding may or may not be available to build a village hall such funding would not cover the upkeep of the hall and the precept would have to be increased ten fold to meet the annual running costs.
|
MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MALLERSTANG PARISH MEETINGHELD ON THE 21ST JUNE 2001 AT ST MARY'S CHURCH MALLERSTANG |
|
A minute's silence was held
in respect of those residents of the Dale who had passed away since the
previous meeting.
|
Minutes
of the Meeting
|
| 1.
Apologies for Absence were received from: The Parish Clerk, Paul Watson,
who had an unavoidable business meeting in London; also from Graham
Carver, Wyn Hamilton, Rosemary Howard, Carole O'Connor, and David Waring. Those Present: in addition to nine Mallerstang Residents, we welcomed Cllr Trevor Ladhams 2. Minutes of the last meeting: It was proposed by Roger Howard, seconded by John Hill that the minutes of the meeting held on 21st June 2001 be accepted as a correct record. This was agreed unanimously. 3. Matters Arising: None 4. Officers' Reports: The Chairman had nothing to report that was not included elsewhere on the Agenda. There were some questions for the Parish Clerk (see Any Other Business). 5.Travers Institute Report (Part 1): The Chairman proposed taking this in two sections: the insurance of the site now, and then more general matters after Mr Nichols' presentation on PlusBus. This was agreed. Insurance Matters: At the request of the meeting the question of insurance cover for the Travers Institute site was broadened to include the various other structures and pieces of land that are, or may be, the responsibility of the Parish. It was stated by Roger Howard that the initial cover provided by Eden District Council for the Pinfold and the Water Cut sculptures would end after five years. And in addition to the question of insuring the site of the Travers Institute, there was also the question of whether there should be cover for the Village Green in Outhgill. It was pointed out that in the future there may be need for a policy that covers some or all of these sites, but that the position on each was still far from clear at the moment. In the case of the Travers Institute site the matter was more pressing. In theory the Chairman of the Parish Meeting and the Chief Executive of Eden District Council were jointly liable, as Trustees of the Charity. The Chairman said that he was personally inclined to rely upon such cover as was already arranged by Eden District Council; however the Parish Clerk at the meeting on 1st November had given his opinion that it would be prudent for the Parish to ensure that the site was adequately insured, by one means or another. The Clerk had made enquiries by phone to try to clarify the position with EDC's solicitors but no reply had yet been received. There are at three main possibilities: (i) the site may already be covered sufficiently via Eden District Council; (ii) Keith Beven had agreed at the meeting on 1st November to investigate the possibility of including the insurance in his general house insurance for Fanny House. There was not yet any further information on this, (iii) but if other possibilities do not provide the necessary cover, it may be necessary for the present insurance to be renewed from Parish funds. Actions to be taken: (a) The meeting instructed the Parish Clerk to write to Eden District Council to try to clarify the position, both in respect of the Travers Institute Site and in the case of the other sites/structures mentioned above. (b) The Chairman would seek to clarify with Keith Beven the possibility of cover for the Travers Institute Site under his own house insurance. (c) The Chairman asked that this meeting give approval for payment of the premium if no other satisfactory solution had been found before the present insurance becomes due for renewal next February. This was proposed by Steven Alderson, Seconded by Gordon Hutton, and carried unanimously. 6. Cumbria PlusBus Presentation The business of the meeting was suspended at 8.10 p.m. so that Mr John Nichols could give a presentation on the Cumbria PlusBus service. Mr Nichols explained the background to this service which originated from a research project by University College, London.The Company was formed after two public meetings in Kirkby Stephen. All the members are unpaid volunteers. At present it has the status as a Charitable Company and is applying to become a Registered Charity. It is funded mainly by grants from University College, Cumbria County Council and the Countryside Agency. To continue to obtain funding the project must be run by local people and shown to be supported locally, including some funding from the villages which benefit from the services. Mr Nichols reported that there is a possibility of extending the service to provide two buses per day to terminate at Outhgill. On present plans the first would leave Kirkby Stephen at 12.25 pm, arriving in Outhgill at 12.37. The second bus would leave Kirkby Stephen at 15.25, arriving in Outhgill at 15.37 p.m. Mallerstang would be asked to make a contribution towards the extra running costs involved. The annual additional running costs were estimated to be £3289. In view of the small population of Mallerstang Parish, the full contribution requested would be less than the usual 10% of running costs (£329). The exact amount has not been finalised, but it would probably be approximately £180 per annum. Mr Nichols invited questions. It was represented that the service suggested would not be very convenient - for example, the times of the suggested buses would not allow residents to attend the Health Centre; two buses per day did not provide a flexible service, many residents were not within walking distance of Outhgill. Mr Nichols could not promise more than two buses, and there was no possibility of extending the service beyond Outhgill, but there was some possibility of looking again at times of buses. The Chairman thanked Mr Nichols for his presentation and said that the meeting would discuss the matter further, and that he would contact Mr Nichols with the results of our discussion. 7. Discussion of PlusBus After Mr Nichols had left, there was a discussion on the proposals he had outlined. It was the sense of the meeting that two buses per day would not be of sufficient use to residents to justify the contribution that would be required. The Chairman asked for an indication of opinion before taking the matter further. Those in favour of agreeing to request the service be extended to Outhgill: 0 Those against: 6 Abstaining: 3 The Chairman said that he would contact Mr Nichols and report that we were reluctantly unable to recommend acceptance of the proposed extension. 8. Travers Institute Report (Part 2): The meeting now returned to consideration of the Travers Institute report. There was general discussion but there were few additions to the points discussed at the meeting on 1st November. The suggestion of a notice marking the site did not receive support and was not put to a vote. After general discussion the resolution suggested by the 1st November meeting was put to the vote: "There is no advantage in providing a new Village Hall on the Travers Institute land at present, and it is therefore proposed: (1) that the situation be reviewed in not more than 5 years from now. (2) it is recommended that the land be offered for use as a garden at a reasonable fee, without exclusive possession being given." This was proposed from the Chair and seconded by Mr Howard. It was carried unanimously. The Chairman said that there would be a report to the next Parish Meeting on the matter of insurance for the site, and on any agreement with Keith Beven about its use as a garden. He hoped that, apart from this, the Travers Institute would not appear again on the agenda of any Parish meeting before 2006, unless the situation changed in any important respect before then. 9. Parish Precept for 2002/2003 The Chairman reported a suggestion from the Parish Clerk that the precept be set at £250. This would be sufficient to cover our commitments, including a slight increase in the fee for the Parish Accounts to be audited. There was a brief discussion. Mr Stephen Alderson said that in his opinion the precept should be as near zero as possible. Mr Richard O'Connor asked whether it was possible for the auditing to be carried out informally so as to reduce this fee. Cllr Ladhams replied that because the Parish Meeting was an official body, the accounts had to be professionally audited and a set fee applies. There being no proposals for any other amount, it was proposed from the Chair that the Precept for next year be set at £250. Seconded by Mr Hutton. In favour: 6 Against: 0 Abstentions: 3 Carried. 10 Any Other Business (a) It was requested that a set of accounts be sent out with the meeting notice for the AGM (b) Mr Howard asked that the Parish Clerk take up once again with BT the question of an electricity supply to the phone box in Outhgill. (c) Mr Howard also considered that Correspondence should always appear as an agenda item at future meetings. The Chairman said that he would pass this on to the Parish Clerk. (d) The Chairman distributed copies of the Mallerstang Millennium Group photograph. Mr John Hill commented adversely on the quality and asked if the parish had paid for them. The Chairman replied that the main priority had been the production of a good quality Millennium Book, which included this photograph. But it had been promised that a copy of the group photo would also be available for anybody who wished to have one. No parish funds had been used; the project had been carried out entirely within the Lottery grant. (e) Mr McWhirter commented that as Foot & Mouth was coming to an end, we must ensure that the sites used for disinfection stations are tidied up, and the fence along Watergate Bottom removed. (f) Mr Howard had wished to ask the Parish Clerk about progress in binding together the Minutes of Parish Meetings. Mr Alderson said that a Minutes Book would be preferable to loose-leaf minutes, and in addition to minutes it could be an important record of other things, e.g. a list of all assets of the parish. The Chairman said he would bring these comments to the attention of the Parish Clerk. (g) Mr Hutton asked that consideration be given to ways of marking the Queen's Golden Jubilee. The Chairman confirmed that no proposals had been received so far, but undertook to include this as an item at the next meeting. |
Parish Meeting General Index Page